ľ¹ÏÓ°Ôº

Skip to Main Navigation

Devaki Ghose


Devaki Ghose is an Economist in the Trade and International Integration Unit of the Development Research Group. Her primary fields of research are international trade, migration, and infrastructure. She is particularly interested in studying the distributional consequences of trade and infrastructure investments in developing countries. Recent projects analyze how trade policy, offshoring, and migration responses affect each other via individual and firm responses to economic shocks. She received her PhD in economics from the University of Virginia in 2020.


  • Fertilizer Import Bans, Agricultural Exports, and Welfare: Evidence from Sri Lanka

    In May 2021, the government of Sri Lanka imposed an abrupt and unexpected ban on the imports of all chemical fertilizers. This paper uses this unprecedented natural experiment to quantify the costs of a lack of fertilizer access for agricultural production and trade in the context of a developing economy where agriculture is centrally important. The analysis combines novel high-frequency firm-level trade data, detailed agricultural ground production data, crop yield estimates from state-of-the-art remote sensing techniques, and dynamic event study designs. The findings show that the fertilizer ban led to dramatic declines in agricultural production, fertilizer imports, and exports of fertilizer-dependent crops. Using a quantitative trade model, the paper finds that the ban's welfare effects were equivalent to a 4.4 percent income reduction on average, with losses disproportionately concentrated on farmers and estate workers (whose income is tied to agriculture) relative to mobile workers and on regions specialized in the cultivation of relatively fertilizer-intensive crops. The findings quantify the equilibrium value of fertilizer in agriculture, an important estimate for any fertilizer-related policy (such as fertilizer subsidies) and for the public debate on the costs and benefits of environmental regulation more generally.

  • Reducing gender-specific commuting barriers in developing countries has complex and diverse effects on women's labor dynamics. We study a program that offers free bus rides for women in several Indian states (the \textit{Pink Slip} program) using a synthetic difference-in-differences approach to shed light on labor supply and time use decisions of women. We observe decreased bus expenses and time saved on travel. Skilled employed women increase labor supply, while low-skill married women shift focus to household chores. Unemployed women intensify job searches, yet overall employment rates remain unchanged. Our findings highlight that alleviating commuting costs does not uniformly boost women's labor participation, as gender roles and societal norms continue to shape outcomes.

RESEARCHER WEBSITE
RESOURCES

Stay Connected