In the developing world, most businesses aren¡¯t registered with municipal or tax authorities. Many have argued that these ¡°informal¡± firms hurt local tax revenues, cut into the customer base of ¡°formal¡± firms and lead to low wages for workers. Despite a decade of reforms to make it easier for firms to register, however, the trend has barely budged.
What is going on? Why aren¡¯t firms lining up to register after governments around the world significantly cut down on the time and cost needed to register a business? Is something other than the registration process that is holding firms back? How should we adjust our approach to the informal economy? These topics were explored July 9 at the Policy Research Talks Series, a monthly event by the World Bank¡¯s research department that aims to foster a dialogue between researchers and operational colleagues.
¡°The persistence of informality suggests there may be too much focus on becoming formal but not enough focus on the costs and benefits of being formal for businesses,¡± said World Bank Research Director Asli Demirguc-Kunt, who chaired the event. ¡°It¡¯s time to rethink policy approaches to informality.¡±
The cost of going formal, including registration fees, tax payments and even land rights, outweighs the benefit for most informal firms, said David McKenzie, a lead economist in the research department¡¯s finance and private sector development team, who has studied informal firms extensively. ¡°Most firms are making what is for them the privately rational decision.¡±
Size is a major factor. The majority of informal firms ¨C 90% in Sri Lanka, for example ¨C are subsistence enterprises with no paid employees, and only a small percentage have more than five workers. Even after registration, those firms likely will pay little in taxes under a progressive income-tax system. They may not be able to compete with large, formal firms, either.