The REACH Trust Fund closed in June 2022. We invite you to watch the for key highlights and milestones of the program.
The REACH Trust Fund closed in June 2022. We invite you to watch the for key highlights and milestones of the program.
Over the last 20 years, governments and households have devoted ever increasing amounts of their national income to education. These investments have led to unprecedented increases in access, and more children are starting school earlier and staying in school longer than ever before. However, spending inefficiencies have meant that the increased investment in education has not so far led to large improvements in learning even in countries that have universalized access to basic education. Many factors underlie this problem, including poor student and teacher attendance, the failure of inputs such as textbooks to reach schools, and the use of education funding by schools for activities unrelated to learning.
Interventions using results-based financing typically consist of more micro-level actions that are taken within the education system, such as the issuance of performance-based school grants and of teacher bonuses. These types of activities aim to change the behaviors of specific actors (e.g. , teachers) to help them focus more sharply on desired results (e.g., improving student learning).
Approximately 400 million primary school-aged children around the world are unable to read proficiently. Evidence from many contexts shows that effective access to and use of textbooks and reading materials are one of the highest impact and most cost-effective ways of improving literacy and raising learning outcomes in developing countries. Yet many children do not have access to the reading materials they need to master basic literacy because of a lack of content in appropriate languages, inflated costs, inefficient supply chains, and ineffective use of books for improving early grade learning outcomes.
Results-based financing can help countries tackle these challenges by making book chains more efficient and, ultimately, ensuring that children receive quality books in languages they understand. While each country will face its own unique challenges, achieving this objective will require strengthening the book chain which includes: a) book forecasting; b) book development and production; c) book procurement; d) supply chain management and distribution; and e) book utilization.
Book Forecasting | Book Development and Production | Book Procurement | Supply Chain Management and Distribution | Book Utilization | Resources
The lack of data on the existing stock of books and on future demand limits the ability of school systems to forecast the book titles and numbers they will need for the upcoming school year. It also hinders the ability of education administrators to develop procurement plans, secure adequate and timely funding, negotiate with suppliers to reduce costs, pinpoint inefficiencies, and evaluate progress. Results-based financing can be used to address book- forecasting challenges by conditioning financing on the creation of an open-data system or a mechanism that supports and incentivizes improved use of available country data systems for book provision, resource mapping, gap analysis, and other related activities. Current REACH interventions in this category incentivize policy makers or local decision makers to improve their use of available country data systems for book availability and distribution to accurately project country book needs.
Learn More: .
Book Development and Production
Many local and regional publishing houses are reluctant to publish relevant titles especially in underserved languages, due to limited financing, low demand, limited authorship capacity, and licensing and copyright issues. Stakeholders are experimenting with the use of results-based financing to incentivize publishers to develop relevant textbooks and supplementary reading materials in local languages as well as to expand access to already published titles. For example, Bangladesh is holding book competitions and awarding monetary and non-monetary prizes to incentivize authors and publishers to develop new titles in local languages, with the aim of bolstering the supply of relevant reading materials to support early-grade reading skills.
Learn More:
In the public sector, book procurement is not always optimized to guarantee the acquisition of good-quality books, value for money, or a regular and financially sustainable supply of textbooks and reading books. An analysis of 32 countries shows that textbook and learning material spending averages 2 percent of primary expenditures for low-income countries. At least part of the inadequate appropriation may be attributed to the fact that in some cases, actual budgets for textbooks and reading books consist of leftover funds rather than the result of an intentional, outcome-based, planning process. Ineffective procurement processes, along with fragmented and unpredictable financing, result in inefficiencies across the book supply chain. Results-based financing can encourage the use of best practices by education authorities, including relying on standard technical specifications for book procurement, developing pooled funding mechanisms, and ensuring that procurement processes achieve the largest possible print runs at the lowest costs.
Learn More:
Supply Chain Management and Distribution
Poor supply chain management and inefficient distribution methods are often the major bottlenecks that countries face in getting books into the hands of children. Because book distribution may be centralized (coordinated by the Ministry of Education) or decentralized (coordinated directly by schools or districts) and involve a number of public, private, and NGO stakeholders, the book distribution process is complex. These complexities are confounded by weak transportation and delivery networks (including storage facilities, vehicles, and roads) that frequently leave books and other learning materials susceptible to damage, loss, and corruption. Such challenges are often exacerbated by a lack of accurate data or a comprehensive education management information system (EMIS), which can facilitate planning, delivery, and maintenance of necessary supplies of textbooks and reading books.
Results-based financing can be used to support supply chain management by incentivizing the development of results-based monitoring systems, like Track and Trace. Track and Trace is a technology platform that enables government, school-level, and other book distribution stakeholders to track the real-time ordering and distribution of books and other learning materials. It can put focus on known points of vulnerability along the book value chain, creating a transparent accountability process. Results-based financing could then be used to promote improvements along the chain, ultimately, making texts accessible to children. Current activities in this category incentivize the various actors and more efficient performance along the supply chain and have the potential to ensure that textbooks and supplemental readers are delivered to children in schools at the right time.
Learn More: .
Reports show three key barriers to book usage: poor book quality, limited teacher training, and teacher reluctance to issue books to students. Even if schools have enough textbooks and reading books, this can impact learning outcomes only if the books are used appropriately in classrooms. For example, one study conducted in Uganda showed that despite the presence of textbooks in schools, students in 86 percent of classrooms did not actually use books. Results-based financing can be used to incentivize better teacher training on how to incorporate books into lessons and to undertake other campaigns aimed at motivating school-level stakeholders (teachers and students) to use books in the classroom.
Learn More:
Government Use of Results-Based Financing in Education
Many governments incorporate elements of results-based financing into their regular planning and budgeting processes. Increasingly, governments are seeking to align their medium-term education budgets with objectives outlined in their education sector's strategic plans. In a more direct approach, some countries are allocating resources to subnational governments and education institutions such as schools and universities based on performance or agreed- upon results. Some governments have also introduced specific results-based interventions within the education system to provide incentives to different actors or institutions and drive improvements in education outcomes.
Evidence Base
REACH is working to strengthen the knowledge base on government use of results-based financing through a number of initiatives. These include:
While results-based financing can be highly effective in the education sector, the approach comes with certain risks. A main risk for governments is that financing becomes less predictable, since disbursement occurs only after results are achieved. For donors, identifying goals that are attainable, impactful, and sustainable can prove challenging. And whenever funding is linked to an indicator, gaming and cheating become possibilities. Such challenges make it all the more critical for incentive programs to identify proper indicators and to include effective systems for verification.
Gaming
Gaming–the act of deliberately improving or otherwise manipulating performance measures–is always a possibility when financing is linked to an indicator, and even the most well-designed systems can be plagued by such problems. If a teacher bonus is tied to student test scores, for example, the teacher may provide answers to students or teach to the test, or schools may even change students’ scores outright. The use of incentives tied to specific results can also result in the neglect of other priorities or lead to other unintended consequences, such as teachers focusing their efforts on more promising students at the cost of slower learners. The likelihood of strategic or gaming behavior tends to increase the higher the stakes are, the longer the intervention has been operating, and the less able recipients are to influence outcome. Even as it is difficult to prevent gaming, some strategies can help to discourage the practice, such as including several verifiable metrics or setting targets that are conducive to learning or that help build capacity, instead of linking aid to specific inputs or outputs.
Indicators
It isn’t always easy to know which indicators are the “right” ones in any development financing project, but indicators in results-based financing carry more weight because the disbursement of funds occurs only after the indicators are achieved. Results-based indicators must strike a balance between cost, effort, feasibility, and ambition. World Bank education projects typically use four types of disbursement-linked indicators: input (e.g., set number of textbooks delivered to school), process (an effective curriculum put into place), intermediate (number of schools inspected with reports published on government website), and outcome (demonstrated improvement in student test scores). Few of these projects adopt inputs or outcomes as indicators; any indicators related to traditional inputs tend to focus on quality aspects, whereas outcomes, while providing benefactors with independence, can be hardest to achieve. Given how difficult it can be to identify a clear formula that leads to strong learning outcomes, it is helpful to understand the results chain when deciding on the best disbursement-linked indicators. Many projects tend to concentrate efforts “further up” the chain, focusing on intermediate outcomes and even process inputs and indicators, such as capacity building. Other factors to consider when selecting indicators: the timeframe of the project and pricing, including the ability of an indicator to unlock processes and progress beyond its direct value.
Verification
Results-based financing, by its very nature, depends on the verification of results. Without credible systems that can evaluate whether a target or result was attained, results-based financing will not work. Thus, resources should be set aside to guarantee that results can be reported and verified, whether by strengthening existing systems for data collection and reporting, auditing, and evaluation, or providing for independent verification of results. There are various ways to collect and report data to monitor the achievement of indicators. Generally, if government information systems and administrative data are available–such as through a country’s education management information system–this can offer the cheapest option, as long as the data are reliable, accurate, and up-to-date. An alternative is to create a parallel structure to gather the necessary data. While this may be more reliable than working with existing systems, it can be a missed opportunity to strengthen in-country capacity, whether of a school, a district government, or a national-level ministry.
Results in Education for All Children (REACH) seeks to help countries strengthen their education services by focusing programs and initiatives on results, with the ultimate goal of boosting learning outcomes especially among the most vulnerable populations.
Established in 2015, the World Bank program funds results-based financing projects and provides technical support and advice on results-based financing in education to other World Bank teams and development partners. One of its main goals is to contribute to the evidence base around results-based financing in education, gathering data and knowledge that can be used to develop better education programs and policies, with the goal of boosting education outcomes.
REACH is funded by the Government of Norway through , the Government of the United States of America through , and the Government of Germany through the .
In line with the World Bank’s Education Strategy 2020, REACH supports the institution's efforts to build evidence on and operational knowledge of results-based financing in education through its grant programs and knowledge-sharing activities. The information is captured in a knowledge suite of products on the evidence, lessons learned, and impact around the use of results-based financing. These products offer different levels of knowledge for different purposes and audiences from practitioners to policy makers, and they range from a broad review of the use of results-based financing in education (“RBF review”) to several notes series to blogs and videos.
